Union
W-L: (22-14) PR = 97.8216Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 1004 A Army AH (12-17, 96.9) 1- 1 1010 H Mercyhurst AH ( 6-27, 95.4) 5- 2 1011 H Mercyhurst AH ( 6-27, 95.4) 5- 3 1017 A Niagara AH (13-23, 96.1) 3- 2 1018 A Niagara AH (13-23, 96.1) 6- 0 1031 A RPI ECAC (11-23, 96.3) 2- 5 1101 H RPI ECAC (11-23, 96.3) 3- 0 1107 A Clarkson ECAC (18-19, 97.2) 1- 5 1108 A St Lawrence ECAC ( 7-25, 95.3) 5- 2 1114 A UMass Lowell HE (13-22, 97.1) 7- 1 1115 A New Hamp HE (14-21, 96.6) 6- 0 1121 H Cornell ECAC (23-11, 98.5) 1- 2 1122 H Colgate ECAC (13-21, 96.6) 4- 4 1128 H Sacred Heart AH (23-14, 97.4) 8- 1 1129 H Miami HE (18-16, 98.2) 2- 3 1205 A Princeton ECAC (21-14, 97.7) 1- 5 1206 A Quinnipiac ECAC (27-11, 98.8) 4- 0 1212 A Alaska IND (11-14, 97.3) 5- 1 1213 A Alaska IND (11-14, 97.3) 3- 2 109 H Quinnipiac ECAC (27-11, 98.8) 2- 7 110 H Princeton ECAC (21-14, 97.7) 4- 2 116 A Brown ECAC ( 5-24, 95.5) 4- 0 117 A Yale ECAC ( 8-22, 96.2) 1- 4 119 H Harvard ECAC (16-15, 97.3) 0- 4 124 H RPI ECAC (11-23, 96.3) 5- 4 130 H Dartmouth ECAC (23- 8, 98.5) 2- 4 206 H St Lawrence ECAC ( 7-25, 95.3) 4- 1 207 H Clarkson ECAC (18-19, 97.2) 7- 8 213 A Colgate ECAC (13-21, 96.6) 7- 6 214 A Cornell ECAC (23-11, 98.5) 4- 1 220 A Harvard ECAC (16-15, 97.3) 4- 1 221 A Dartmouth ECAC (23- 8, 98.5) 3- 3 227 H Yale ECAC ( 8-22, 96.2) 5- 4 228 H Brown ECAC ( 5-24, 95.5) 3- 0 228 H Stonehill IND (10-22, 96.5) 2- 5 228 H Alaska IND (11-14, 97.3) 1- 5 307 A Brown ECAC ( 5-24, 95.5) 9- 0 313 H Princeton ECAC (21-14, 97.7) 2- 5 314 H Princeton ECAC (21-14, 97.7) 2- 5
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
1004 A Army 1- 1 0 1 -0.96
1010 H Mercyhurst 5- 2 3 2 0.52
1011 H Mercyhurst 5- 3 2 2 -0.48
1017 A Niagara 3- 2 1 2 -0.72
1018 A Niagara 6- 0 6 2 ++ 4.28
1031 A RPI 2- 5 -3 2 -- -4.50
1101 H RPI 3- 0 3 2 1.48
1107 A Clarkson 1- 5 -4 1 -- -4.64
1108 A St Lawrence 5- 2 3 3 0.44
1114 A UMass Lowell 7- 1 6 1 ++ 5.28
1115 A New Hamp 6- 0 6 1 ++ 4.76
1121 H Cornell 1- 2 -1 -1 -0.37
1122 H Colgate 4- 4 0 1 -1.24
1128 H Sacred Heart 8- 1 7 0 +++ 6.60
1129 H Miami 2- 3 -1 0 -0.66
1205 A Princeton 1- 5 -4 0 -- -4.13
1206 A Quinnipiac 4- 0 4 -1 ++ 4.96
1212 A Alaska 5- 1 4 0 + 3.51
1213 A Alaska 3- 2 1 0 0.51
109 H Quinnipiac 2- 7 -5 -1 -- -4.06
110 H Princeton 4- 2 2 0 1.85
116 A Brown 4- 0 4 2 1.69
117 A Yale 1- 4 -3 2 -- -4.57
119 H Harvard 0- 4 -4 1 -- -4.57
124 H RPI 5- 4 1 2 -0.52
130 H Dartmouth 2- 4 -2 -1 -1.35
206 H St Lawrence 4- 1 3 3 0.42
207 H Clarkson 7- 8 -1 1 -1.66
213 A Colgate 7- 6 1 1 -0.22
214 A Cornell 4- 1 3 -1 + 3.65
220 A Harvard 4- 1 3 1 + 2.45
221 A Dartmouth 3- 3 0 -1 0.67
227 H Yale 5- 4 1 2 -0.59
228 H Brown 3- 0 3 2 0.67
228 H Stonehill 2- 5 -3 1 -- -4.38
228 H Alaska 1- 5 -4 1 -- -4.51
307 A Brown 9- 0 9 2 +++ 6.69
313 H Princeton 2- 5 -3 0 - -3.15
314 H Princeton 2- 5 -3 0 - -3.15
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 1031 A RPI 2- 5 -3 2 -- -4.50 1107 A Clarkson 1- 5 -4 1 -- -4.64 1205 A Princeton 1- 5 -4 0 -- -4.13 109 H Quinnipiac 2- 7 -5 -1 -- -4.06 117 A Yale 1- 4 -3 2 -- -4.57 119 H Harvard 0- 4 -4 1 -- -4.57 228 H Stonehill 2- 5 -3 1 -- -4.38 228 H Alaska 1- 5 -4 1 -- -4.51 313 H Princeton 2- 5 -3 0 - -3.15 314 H Princeton 2- 5 -3 0 - -3.15 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 1128 H Sacred Heart 8- 1 7 0 +++ 6.60 307 A Brown 9- 0 9 2 +++ 6.69 1018 A Niagara 6- 0 6 2 ++ 4.28 1114 A UMass Lowell 7- 1 6 1 ++ 5.28 1115 A New Hamp 6- 0 6 1 ++ 4.76 1206 A Quinnipiac 4- 0 4 -1 ++ 4.96 1212 A Alaska 5- 1 4 0 + 3.51 214 A Cornell 4- 1 3 -1 + 3.65 220 A Harvard 4- 1 3 1 + 2.45 |
Union Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air Force | Union | insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 4- 0) | Union | |
| Army | Union | Union 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Bentley | Union | insuffient: ( 4- 1)( 3- 2) | Union | |
| Canisius | Union | insuffient: ( 4- 1)( 5- 2) | Union | |
| Holy Cross | Union | tied - ( 4- 1) ( 4- 2) | Union | |
| Mercyhurst | Union | Union | ||
| Niagara | Union | Union | ||
| RIT | Union | insuffient: ( 3- 2)( 4- 3) | Union | |
| Rob Morris | Union | insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) | Union | |
| Sacred Heart | Union | Union | ||
| Michigan | Michigan | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Michigan | |
| Michigan St | Michigan St | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 2- 1) | Michigan St | |
| Minnesota | Minnesota | Minnesota | ||
| Notre Dame | Union | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 1) | Union | |
| Ohio State | Ohio State | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Ohio State | |
| Penn State | Penn State | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 1) | Penn State | |
| Wisconsin | Wisconsin | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Wisconsin | |
| Augustana | Augustana | Augustana | ||
| Bemidji St | Union | Union | ||
| Bowl Green | Union | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 1) | Union | |
| Ferris St | Union | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Union | |
| L Superor | Union | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 3- 0) | Union | |
| Mich Tech | Mich Tech | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 1) | Mich Tech | |
| Minn St | Minn St | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 0) | Minn St | |
| No Mich | Union | Union | ||
| St. Thomas | St. Thomas | St. Thomas | ||
| Alaska | Union | Union | ||
| Alaska Anch | Union | tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) | Union | |
| Lindenwood | Union | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 1) | Union | |
| LIU | Union | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 2) | Union | |
| Stonehill | Stonehill | Stonehill | ||
| Brown | Union | Union | ||
| Clarkson | Clarkson | Clarkson | ||
| Colgate | Union | Union | ||
| Cornell | Cornell | Cornell 8- 3 vs 4- 4 | ||
| Dartmouth | Dartmouth | Dartmouth | ||
| Harvard | Harvard | Harvard 8- 4 vs 3- 5 | ||
| Princeton | Princeton | Princeton | ||
| Quinnipiac | Quinnipiac | Quinnipiac 8- 2 vs 5- 4 | ||
| RPI | Union | Union | ||
| St Lawrence | Union | Union | ||
| Yale | Union | tied - ( 4- 5) ( 4- 8) | Union | |
| Boston Col | Boston Col | insuffient: ( 4- 2)( 2- 1) | Boston Col | |
| Boston Univ | Union | insuffient: ( 3- 2)( 2- 1) | Union | |
| Connecticut | Union | Union 3- 1 vs 1- 1 | ||
| Maine | Maine | insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 2- 2) | Maine | |
| UMass | UMass | tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) | UMass | |
| Merrimack | Merrimack | insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 4- 2) | Merrimack | |
| New Hamp | Union | Union | ||
| Northeastern | Northeastern | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 3- 2) | Northeastern | |
| Providence | Providence | insuffient: ( 5- 2)( 4- 0) | Providence | |
| UMass Lowell | Union | Union | ||
| Vermont | Union | Union 4- 1 vs 2- 4 | ||
| Arizona St | Union | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | Union | |
| Colorado Col | Colorado Col | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 0) | Colorado Col | |
| Denver | Denver | insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 0) | Denver | |
| Miami | Miami | Miami | ||
| Minn Duluth | Minn Duluth | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 0) | Minn Duluth | |
| North Dakota | Union | Union 2- 3 vs 0- 1 | ||
| Omaha | Union | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) | Union | |
| St Cloud St | St Cloud St | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 1) | St Cloud St | |
| Western Mich | Western Mich | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | Western Mich |
PowerWise = 33
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 36.29
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
1 A Army (12-17, 96.9) 1- 1 -3.04 1.60 0.01 0.93 0.00
1 H Mercyhurst ( 6-27, 95.4) 5- 2 -4.55 1.00 -0.01 0.93 1.84
1 H Mercyhurst ( 6-27, 95.4) 5- 3 -4.55 1.00 -0.01 0.93 1.84
1 A Niagara (13-23, 96.1) 3- 2 -3.81 1.00 0.01 0.93 1.88
1 A Niagara (13-23, 96.1) 6- 0 -3.81 1.00 0.01 0.93 1.88
1 A RPI (11-23, 96.3) 2- 5 -3.59 1.06 0.01 0.93 -1.67
1 H RPI (11-23, 96.3) 3- 0 -3.59 1.06 -0.01 0.93 1.95
1 A Clarkson (18-19, 97.2) 1- 5 -2.73 1.92 0.01 0.93 -1.26
1 A St Lawrence ( 7-25, 95.3) 5- 2 -4.65 1.00 0.01 0.93 1.88
1 A UMass Lowell (13-22, 97.1) 7- 1 -2.80 1.85 0.01 0.93 3.45
1 A New Hamp (14-21, 96.6) 6- 0 -3.33 1.32 0.01 0.93 2.47
1 H Cornell (23-11, 98.5) 1- 2 -1.44 3.21 -0.01 0.93 -0.67
1 H Colgate (13-21, 96.6) 4- 4 -3.31 1.34 -0.01 0.93 0.00
1 H Sacred Heart (23-14, 97.4) 8- 1 -2.47 2.18 -0.01 0.93 4.03
1 H Miami (18-16, 98.2) 2- 3 -1.73 2.92 -0.01 0.93 -0.81
1 A Princeton (21-14, 97.7) 1- 5 -2.22 2.43 0.01 0.93 -1.03
1 A Quinnipiac (27-11, 98.8) 4- 0 -1.13 3.52 0.01 0.93 6.57
1 A Alaska (11-14, 97.3) 5- 1 -2.58 2.07 0.01 0.93 3.88
1 A Alaska (11-14, 97.3) 3- 2 -2.58 2.07 0.01 0.93 3.88
1 H Quinnipiac (27-11, 98.8) 2- 7 -1.13 3.52 -0.01 0.93 -0.53
1 H Princeton (21-14, 97.7) 4- 2 -2.22 2.43 -0.01 0.93 4.51
1 A Brown ( 5-24, 95.5) 4- 0 -4.40 1.00 0.01 0.93 1.88
1 A Yale ( 8-22, 96.2) 1- 4 -3.66 1.00 0.01 0.93 -1.70
1 H Harvard (16-15, 97.3) 0- 4 -2.64 2.01 -0.01 0.93 -1.23
1 H RPI (11-23, 96.3) 5- 4 -3.59 1.06 -0.01 0.93 1.95
1 H Dartmouth (23- 8, 98.5) 2- 4 -1.42 3.23 -0.01 0.93 -0.66
1 H St Lawrence ( 7-25, 95.3) 4- 1 -4.65 1.00 -0.01 0.93 1.84
1 H Clarkson (18-19, 97.2) 7- 8 -2.73 1.92 -0.01 0.93 -1.27
1 A Colgate (13-21, 96.6) 7- 6 -3.31 1.34 0.01 0.93 2.51
1 A Cornell (23-11, 98.5) 4- 1 -1.44 3.21 0.01 0.93 6.00
1 A Harvard (16-15, 97.3) 4- 1 -2.64 2.01 0.01 0.93 3.77
1 H Yale ( 8-22, 96.2) 5- 4 -3.66 1.00 -0.01 0.93 1.84
1 H Brown ( 5-24, 95.5) 3- 0 -4.40 1.00 -0.01 0.93 1.84
1 H Stonehill (10-22, 96.5) 2- 5 -3.44 1.20 -0.01 0.93 -1.61
1 H Alaska (11-14, 97.3) 1- 5 -2.58 2.07 -0.01 0.93 -1.20
1 A Brown ( 5-24, 95.5) 9- 0 -4.40 1.00 0.01 0.93 1.88
1 H Princeton (21-14, 97.7) 2- 5 -2.22 2.43 -0.01 0.93 -1.04
1 H Princeton (21-14, 97.7) 2- 5 -2.22 2.43 -0.01 0.93 -1.04
------
47.86
|
winning pts = 63.5750 losing points = -15.7131
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------